Great software.It should have more extensions.It's powerful,but for many uses,it's not easy-to-use.
For Example, when i search ducuments ,I have five favorite folders, and i have to retype the folders name every time.
and when i search executive files,I have two favorite folders,and i have to retype the folders name every time.
My 90% time spend on these two tasks, Can i do it more easy?
Great software,it should have more extensions.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:58 am
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:58 am
Re: Great software,it should have more extensions.
I used 1.2.1.451a just a moment ago,the filter function works,and can resolve my problem,even not so perfect.
I am wondering why it works slower when using filter function.
I am wondering why it works slower when using filter function.
Re: Great software,it should have more extensions.
Agreed.
A way to (temporarily) "lock" a portion of the search string would be nice.
Such that you needed worry about inadvertently erasing or loosing part of the search term - say "locking" a directory prefix.
As an example, say that the [C:\DOCS\] portion would be "locked", with only the search strings that follow, able to be changed.
(Kind of like, dare I say, the way Windows 7 Explorer shows directory paths.)
A way to (temporarily) "lock" a portion of the search string would be nice.
Such that you needed worry about inadvertently erasing or loosing part of the search term - say "locking" a directory prefix.
As an example, say that the [C:\DOCS\] portion would be "locked", with only the search strings that follow, able to be changed.
Code: Select all
[C:\DOCS\] .png
[C:\DOCS\] .jpg
[C:\DOCS\] .wri