-read-only behaviors differ

General discussion related to "Everything".
Post Reply
therube
Posts: 4977
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:48 pm

-read-only behaviors differ

Post by therube »

-read-only behaviors differ, compared to not -read-only


Just noting that some behaviors differ if -read-only is set.



like "typeahead fast" (or whatever if might be called where you just start typing characters in the Results window)
- finds only 1st. char
- type: "0123"
finds: 0 1 2 3 (that is AN item that starts with 0, then, AN item that starts with 1, then,...)
rather then an item that starts with "0123"


(Other behaviors also differ.)
void
Developer
Posts: 16753
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:31 pm

Re: -read-only behaviors differ

Post by void »

-read-only shouldn't affect the "jump to" search.

I haven't been able to reproduce the issue my end.

Maybe this is an instance issue?

Are you using a unique instance with -read-only?
Any notable setting changes listed under Help -> Troubleshooting Information?
therube
Posts: 4977
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:48 pm

Re: -read-only behaviors differ

Post by therube »

Are you using a unique instance with -read-only?
Yes, that would be the case.
Any notable setting changes listed under Help -> Troubleshooting Information?
I'll have to take a look...
therube
Posts: 4977
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:48 pm

Re: -read-only behaviors differ

Post by therube »

-read-only is not the issue.


jump_to_timeout=0


(once i found out where the particular instance with the issue was...)
who knows. maybe i was ... no clue?
maybe wanting to set it to "default", with the thinking that 0 was "default", but default is actually 1000.
or maybe... who knows.

so that was that issue.
& yes, this i must have done.
how, why, where... or how that got set in the particular -instance, got me.
Post Reply